The other two major changes are inconsequential compared to track rendering that is 5x as fast and 3x better than before.
Seriously, it’s like night and day. I want to go back and remaster all my tracks- the clarity is amazing. Maybe this just brings Ableton up to speed with the big-boys like Cubase and Pro Tools, but it’s a huge upgrade for Ableton users.
Depends. 96/32 usually. Sometimes 192/32 if it’s a very complex track. I don’t use 64 bit because most of my plugins (and many of Ableton’s own plugins) don’t work at all
It just seems to draw a more distinct line with EQing than before. It’s measured by how it sounds to me.
No need to get all technical. I happen to love the results.
Im enjoying 9.1. I have a huge 27 inch monitor so having two windows side by side for arranger and session views is really great. Kind of like Bitwig actually!
As for the rendering. It is certainly faster and, to my ears, I do agree with the above that it seems to have more clarity. Im sharing files with folk via Dropbox to work on so we keep the sample quality down to about 44.1 to save space and upload times and have to say that the two files I rendered last night definitely appear to have a little more clarity to them. Not much mind you but enough.