Hi Folks -
I’ll try to keep this fairly brief. I just got an Octatrack, and am planning on prepping a live set. I have exported some “doodles” from Ableton Live in loops organized by BPM. I have about 4 different tempos ranging from 110-128, with sets of loops from anywhere from 3-5 “sketches” that I plan to import into the OT. My sample folder looks something like this:
110BPM:
----Song 1
----------Loop 1, Loop 2, Loop 3, etc…
----Song 2
----------Loop 1, Loop 2, Loop 3, etc…
----Song 3
----------Loop 1, Loop 2, Loop 3, etc…
115BPM:
----Song 1
----------Loop 1, Loop 2, Loop 3, etc…
----Song 2
----------Loop 1, Loop 2, Loop 3, etc…
Once in OT, I will turn these into completed tunes which, along with my other gear, I will perform live. There is also a folder of sample chains which I use to create drum beats (and I will also use a Tempest or SparkLE - I haven’t decided yet.)
My questions are primarily with respect to organizing these items. My initial thought is to have one bank per “song”, which will consist of a bunch of loops in a given tempo that I will play back using patterns, parts, and scenes that move me through the performance. But I’m concerned that 4 scenes won’t be enough to get me through an entire tempo group.
So another thought was to use different projects per tempo, and use multiple banks since stopping to load projects between “songs” of different tempo probably wouldn’t be that disruptive.
TL;DR: I have 4 tempo groups, each with about 3-4 sets of loops. Should I use a project per tempo group, or bank per tempo group?