I think my natural assumption was a Parkinson’s Disease reference.
Now there’s nothing wrong with that, but when it went without further contextualisation it set me a little on edge—as though a title such as that should be the preserve of an author perhaps experiencing the disease or directly or exploring its impacts.
Writing that down sounds faintly ridiculous (it certainly doesn’t offend me), but it was there as a nag, so thought I’d share it.