Well, if you are only using the Manager module and copying Parts, you are only using ~10% of the program… are using the Project module? The Samples module? The Sequencer module? The Chainer module? The Arp Designer module? The LFO Designer module? The module? The Library module?
Thanks Rusty, I know the modules are there, just wondering what specific tasks are being used by the guys in here.
The thing is that i have 2 Octatracks so I bought Octaedit to copy parts between projects and Octas… Something i can´t do any other way.
And I really prefer to stay away from the computer as much as I can, that´s why i´m using 2 Octas, as a DAW replacement. And that´s why I was asking if there is anyone using Octaedit for something that may help my workflow in such a way that i´d prefer to use the mouse instead of knobs.
I’m trying to use OctaEdit manager module to compile various tracks, banks etc from different projects into a clean streamlined new project. While i can move a bank or a pattern and part I’ve been unable to move the associated samples. Anyone have any luck with this? Using mac version 0.1000
I’m left clicking on the source sample then left clicking on the target slot then right clicking and selecting paste slots. Is there anything else that I should be doing?
I assume that all your sample paths are valid / legal file names. If thats the case, then it sounds like a miscalculation when assignning the samples… I’ll have to look into that and get back to you asap.
Shedload of coding/fixes for various GUI elements, resizing, repainting etc. Might have missed one or two, but the vast bulk is sorted.
Updated Manual… now 399 pages / 48,083 words / 271,220 characters, and lots of pretty pictures… peeps spend 8 years writing twice that and get a phd for their efforts
New OSX Installer.
Updated Installation Guide for Windows/OSX.
Samples Module
Sample Slots: Added Actions button to invoke context menu as alternative option to right-clicking table.
Sample Slices: Added Actions button to invoke context menu as alternative option to right-clicking table.
Sequencer Module
New ‘Sequencer Actions’: Copy any element of the Project… (Screenshot #01)
Added ‘Sequencer Detail’ group with a whole bunch of party tricks…
New Sequencer Detail View: Audio Trigs : Graphically edit Audio Trigs, Slide, Swing and Recorder (AB/CD/IN/OS) Trigs. (Screenshot #02)
New Sequencer Detail View: Midi Trigs : Graphically edit Midi Trigs and Swing. (Screenshot #03)
Check the new build I just released (v0.9.000) and see if that resolves your issues?
Note that I’ve completely redone the UI/UX, so best to check the manual (Section 9, pp231) for all the changes, and Section 24 (pp382) for some user stories.
With the release of v0.9.000, my focus now is being concentrated on bug hunting, and polishing everything up for a v1.0.000 release.
If you feel that there is anything missing, or stuff that you would really like, do let me know, and I’ll see where that fits into everything, if its already on its way, and/or if it will be in before v1.0.000
I think at some point I need to draw a line in the sand, as there is already a ridiculous amount of functionality in OctaEdit, concentrate on ensuring there are no bugs kicking around, and get OctaEdit out to the masses.
why not live editing on computer with round-trip updates to and from the OT thru MIDI sysex? or maybe you could hack something together in assembly to make the OT function like a USB plugin?
The Octatrack doesn’t even have a full Midi specification, lacking a few critical items, but I digress.
[quote=“invisible_acropolis, post:946, topic:4742”]
or maybe you could hack something together in assembly to make the OT function like a USB plugin? [/quote]
Because even if you hacked together something like that, to make the USB function as being addressable, so you could use it as a plugin, you’re still not going to be able to access the CF card, as you can only have one master for it, computer or the Octatrack…
And who’s going to pay me for coding a new OS for the Octatrack?
i was just joking around but your reply seems to indicate you have already looked into these kinds of ideas, and thats interesting
as far as who will pay for a new OS… who paid for OctaEdit? same deal I would guess… I didnt think such a thing as a new OS was even possible - but I guarantee you would have a lot of interested people just built-in from that, not to mention all the other OT owners with questions and complaints about “Why not this” and “Why not that” and so on… so I would suspect all of them are probably willing to pay a reasonable amount for a properly hot-rodded OS for the OT … kinda like how the MPC runs 100x better with JJOS