One of the reasons people like the old Roland drum machines is that their sequencer isn’t 100% grid accurate which gives the patterns some groove even though none of them feature a swing setting. They all have some amount of jitter.
9 Likes
Oh trust, I really really want a MW1. (Or a M more realistically.)
But if I already have a MMMD, how many do I have to “complete the set”? Desire is strong of course, but do i want to own things and learn instruments, or do I want to do things with the instruments I’ve got a flow state on? My quality brain-time is a series of tradeoffs…
That hits hard.
3 Likes
And there it is: the balance between owning and learning new instruments or making and finishing more music with a relatively stable core setup.
Or any combination on that spectrum. Or just jamming on your instruments to be creative and unwind with no intent to “finish” anything.
Any of which are valid, and if one enjoys the journey, that’s what matters.
1 Like
Great writeup and I agree with nearly all of what you say. As I was reading it, I thought to myself that yep, this isn why I no longer need an MPC: I know all those production tricks already. And this is why I don’t need an MC-101: I know how those sounds are made and the difference between a true roland JX chorus and an off-the-shelf chorus is negligible in my tracks.
There’s still one big exception though and that’s the Elektron workflow, in my case the Syntakt. Specifically, ctrl+all. There is just something entirely unique about it. Of course, I understand it from a practical point of view, but the point is that I could never recreate that in the DAW. There is no easy way (at least in Reason) to assign a macro that will manipulate the filter cutoff of the synth oscillator envelopes at once. And it’s impossible to know what those type of real-time manipulations will do to your song sketch until you try it.
Bottom line is, you’re right, after ten years of music making, I have definitely reach a point where I don’t need most of my hardware anymore… except my Syntakt!
typically new gear is inspirational, just because human brain loves new toys.
1 Like
Awesome topic. Infact, so awesome, I’ve devoted a video to it. As we all struggle with GAS, the next best live-saving synth, synthpeer pressure, midlife shenanigans… But there are ways to simplify things. I’ve tried to explain that as best I could and hope it’s helpful. Thanks and perhaps see anyone in Berlin?
5 Likes
Haha. Nice one.
PS. What’s my cut of the adsense revenue? 
3 Likes
I’ve been thinking about this a bit because sometimes I have to mull over things for a while.
What do you think about this having some correlation to the honeymoon effect where you’re in a state of bliss with music, but at some point the honeymoon is over. So literally your brain produces dopamine because it’s pleasurable to create music but the more you get used to it, the more immune you become until you stop associating the feeling with feeling good, then you start to look towards what is causing you to feel less than what you did before?
Perhaps to not reach a point of having exhausted one’s “bliss” towards pure creativity is an indication of mental illness instead of wellness, or an extreme state of zen is required to continue feeling blissful about it - or perhaps there must be something that constantly ups the ante, such as forward momentum that produces a measurable result as a supplement to the brain pleasure center’s dwindling output. Maybe a combination of risk taking and a risk taker personality.
I feel like there might be some link here, because if you look at people who are the best in their jobs, some of them really genuinely hate the work they do and they are not invested in it as a matter of pride or enjoyment, but their lack of pleasure allows them to be consistent because they are not doing it for any reward other than the expectation that it is work…
Maybe I’m thinking too far into this but I feel there has to be something more to the equation than simply “more tools equals less repair”, as humans we’re unfortunately not so simple as that.
I think it’s true that if I had more tools when I was at my most creative point, I would have been even more creative than I was at that time. I can’t see it any other way, and I have less tools now than I did then but I distinctly struggle more, in fact I’m less confident of what I make now than I ever was at my apex.
2 Likes
I made more music that I recorded for posterity and enjoyed listening to when I had one piece of hardware (Digitakt).
Since then, I piss about a lot, have templates on my OT to amuse briefly, but make no actual music.
But I am a bad person.
3 Likes
4 Likes
I’m still very much in that zone, but I’m a bit worried how long it will last for.
I’m hoping making tracks just for the hell of it will stay fun, but I have a fear I’ll end up where I got to with guitar. Got to a level where it wasn’t worth the insane effort that would be required to get significantly better in term of technique. Invested in gear to the point where I have a vintage Fender, Gibson and a PRS and a Martin and it was pointless to keep playing the GAS game and now I rarely play with any purpose though I am quite accomplished.
1 Like
That’s definitely one of the factors I take into account.
Being a solo musician, I have to take into account a lot of aspects that a band would already have from specialization.
I can buy basses, guitars, drum pads… but I will be probably best served moving forward with one non-synth instrument at a time. And since I can’t fit a full kit into my 2nd floor half height bedroom studio, driving my bass experience seems the best option.
In these cases, the GAS is partially after hitting a wall of competency but compounded by not knowing enough locals without paying for session work.
Which, I’m willing to do, but I’ll also have to settle on one path seriously enough to invest the time and $ in the local scene that I’ll never sell enough to recoup on 
I work to make art with others, but working to make art for myself takes a single-mindedness and dedication that goes well beyond purchasable elements.
1 Like
This happens to me to some extent, yeah. It helps me to take breaks - usually after finishing an album or project, but sometimes in the middle of one. I might go weeks without touching any of my gear, and it could be months before I record something again. It sort of helps reset the dopamine feedback loop, and it’s something that I find healthy for myself. It also helps me gather more sources of inspiration (video games and nature being my primary sources).
Sometimes acquiring a new piece of kit can hack that dopamine response and kick it off again, but as noted in other comments that effect is definitely reduced as my knowledge and skill increases.
2 Likes
“hanging delicately in the balance at all times” is the most apropos description of that elusive forward momentum.
1 Like
A thought that has come about from reading back through this is that sometimes it IS actually the tools’ fault that they don’t work how you’d like, hence buying more stuff to try and find one closer to the ideal. I mean, though there’s a lot of options, the actual paradigms are quite limited in range. I have gone quite deep into speccing out what I think would be my preferred way of working, but got to the point where it means I have to make that tool myself. Part of the reason I ended up making less and less music was that I began learning exactly how one could do that by means of electrical engineering + programming which is another life’s worth of mastery in itself.
If anyone is wondering: the MPS Zyklus looks close to my ideal. Imagine that but modernised, and with built in audio recording capacity and you’re nearly there.
Even the great Vangelis had this problem, but also had nearly infinite money to throw at the solution. Wonder if he ever found one?
I mean yeah, but at some point the ideal gear will always be just out of sight.
The gear you can do something (“imperfectly”) with will always be within literal reach.
The ideal gear will transmute to imperfect as soon as it reaches your doorstep.
2 Likes
There seems to be some ratio of never satisfied to always motivated that is key to people who are perpetually driven to create. I doubt infinite money equals a like amount of satiation.
1 Like
Definitely not. Vangelis was always moaning about the lack of expressive instruments in interviews, even though he could afford anything that was available. I think in the end he did in fact get something custom built, which is one thing money can afford when you have lots of it. Like getting a bespoke suit from Saville Row. Or some proper shoes made just for your feet.
Not if it is already inside your house… 
(ie you make it yourself)
I’m still pursuing this path but it is slow going. And having lost the impetus to make music kind of knocked the wind out of the sails of making things to make music. But learning to program has been really rewarding, as has slowly getting to grips with the mystical dark arts of EE.
1 Like