Me neither, but I only have one chair 
I’ve laid my room out so the “work” desk faces one way and the “music” desk faces the other. Different spaces, different colours, different views. I should get a 2nd chair tho’.
3 Likes
No, definitely not. But hardware inherently has more restrictions which, in my opinion (and experience), breeds a mode of thinking that results in stronger concepts and in some cases more refined core qualities since there is “less to hide behind” so to speak.
“Sounding better” is more than just the algorithms or samplerate or quality of whatever… It’s about making an instrument and deciding on how it should sound.
If we look at some beloved software synthesizers and effects we can definitely see that they follow a similar design pattern to that of a lot of hardware instruments. For example, Soniccharge’s Microtonic and Valhalla DSP’s Vintageverb are two great examples of subjectively deciding on a narrow scope of parameters with a clear concept and functionality.
They both also sound great, while they are quite streamlined each function is honed to a level of quality that makes it greater than the sum of its parts, just like a lot of hardware.
Just one piece of the puzzle, but it’s an interesting one.
20 Likes
SW is certainly on par with HW sounds these days, but HW is definitely more fun to play with.
blinking lights 
1 Like
I’ve got both hardware and soft synths. They both rock. They are both totally radical. I have tons of fun and satisfaction using either, or both simultaneously.
I hook up my Elektron midi keyboard to my iPad, use the Elektrons 4 built in midi tracks and sequencers along with its bonus 4 FM synth tracks to run an additional 4 FM voices on the IPad for an 8 timbre, FM polyphonic setup with physical controls and touchscreen interface.
Hang ten. Or hang eight I guess.
I’m not adding anything here productive that hasn’t already been stated better by others, but I started playing guitar in 1995 as a kid and played almost daily (yeah right – but close) until going off to college. 15 years later, I picked the guitar back up out of the closet and fell in love again.
I would not have been able to pick up a VST that I used in 1995 on a Gateway 2000 and experienced the same thing.
That said I have purchased and use regularly VSTs and love them. The comparison to hardware is just a complex thing at the end of the day. Anyway just my input.
6 Likes
Seems an odd question, nobody has to use hardware. If you prefer software, get on with your bad self and be more productive than the hardware set (in aggregate.)
Oh interesting, I didn’t even know they’d released a plugin version.
1 Like
or:
HW is certainly not on par with SW sounds these days, but HW is definitely more fun to play with, still.
6 Likes
hahah - me too…
I just scoot over and rotate a bit
1 Like
No CPU overload with HW.
5 Likes
There are a lot of differences, but that’s not generally bad vs good.
IMO there are the following topics, which are interesting:
- sound
- sound design features
- usability / user-interface
- sustainability
Just to make my thoughts clear, why there can’t be true answers for everybody
- If we like the sound of a DX7 we will get this nerver from a 100k$ expensive Moog Modular.
- If we like wavetable or granular sounds, that’s not to get from a Sequential Prophet 5
… IMO everybody has to think and to decide on this by him/herself … and there are no hard pro and cons. There are great machines in the market, mediocre, and crap, but also this depends on the artist’s view.
The only pro and cons I see is about sustainability.
- If we take care of a real hardware instrument, it may last decades, and we can play it for our life-time.
- And exactly this can’t be said for software on a computer. Okay, we could preserve the whole thing, computer, accessories, OS, “floppy disks”
etc. … but I think I’m not the only one here, who has seen software discontinued or not ported to the next OS level.
IMO if we look short term it’s more or less on par, but long term the hardware wins … at least in my world
1 Like
Depends on your definition of hardware. I have a hardware sampler than can be overloaded if you use too many voices. I have a hardware groove box that overloads with too many tracks/FX running. But these pieces of hardware have processing units inside.
1 Like
i like having the limits of hardware and limiting myself to one piece of hardware. i get distracted easily and tend to jump around with possibilities on a computer…plus as someone said, I can jump ship and start doing another thing on the computer. I also don’t want to fall into the what if game and spend all my limited time for music trying to figure out how to get the right reverb plug-in or worse, what hardware or software i need to acquire to finish my p e r f e c t s e t u p
nothing wrong with computers though. I admire musicians with the focus to use them and create. just harder for me.
I always wonder - if I went itb, what else would I fill my living area with?
Apparently some people use these things called ornaments… which may or may not cost just as much.
Ornaments are apparently dust magnets just like synths, just they don’t make noises so I don’t see the appeal, personally.
1 Like
Fantastic answers so far. Thank you all so much.
I also only just realized that I’ve asked this question in a forum dedicated to music hardware! 🫤
2 Likes
Imagine Christmas. Presents under the tree. The feeling when you open your giant box with your new synth, the unboxing, the view, the smell, the feeling of the written download code for the vst instrument.
3 Likes
Maybe…I like line noise honestly [not for everyone]
1 Like
Does anyone have more examples of VST/AU instruments that adhere to this design concept? I’m trying to get more into software, but all of the commonly-recommended synths are monstrously complicated.
1 Like
Tactile controls, muscle memory, never crashes, it’s always compatible with everything forever, there’s a connection between a physical instrument and musician, it doesn’t disappear into the ether like all software does eventually, you’ll still own it when your 85.
Those are the things that immediately come to mind for me, I’ve always much preferred hardware. There was absolutely a time where hardware genuinely sounded better than software but that time has long passed but still hardware reigns supreme to me, even if that hardware is essentially software in a box it doesn’t matter, computers are temporary things that will always need to be upgraded/replaced hardware is forever.
Btw how does one procure a gig writing about this, sounds like a dream job to me.
1 Like
Plenty of times I invited a date back home to see my collection of VST plugins and got turned down. I switched to hardware and I’m now married.
Jokes aside, for me the main difference is focus and muscle memory, mostly focus.
4 Likes
Personal preference