Super new to digitakt, trying to wrap my head around elk-herd and transfer, how they play together in a workflow and what is actually happening.
It seems elk-herd/projects only handles pattern-data. I created a few projects and their .syx-files are the same size (4049405 bytes ~ 3.9Mb). So I assume any samples needed for the projects to play correctly should be transferred seperately.
Transfers explore/projects lets me download a .dtprj to the computer. If I unzip them I can see the samples used for the project in the same directory structure as on the digitakt. So the samples are included in .dtprj, I assume all pattern data are included as well.
It seems digitakt is clever about identifying samples (I read somewhere it uses a hash value og the actual wave data as ID.
Assuming the above is correct, what strategies are people using for managing and backing up digitakt data? Is it something like this:
- Transfer for generating a .dtprj. This file can be dropped to the digitakt at any point in the future, and the project will play correctly. Digitakt will restore samples to their original location.
Q: What happens if the same sample is available on the digitakt already, either in the same or a hanged location? - elk-herd for managing projects, stuff like copying patterns (or multiple patterns that make up a track/song) between projects or organizing patterns in a projects.
Q: will elk-herd be smart enough to use the correct sample, even if it’s in a different location in the directory structure?
Sorry if this has been answered to death and/or is totally obvious. I’d rather think (a bit) about this now than when my +drive is full…