Indeed, you can see it that way
It doesnât seem like you can record an initial part in a time signature other than 4/4 though, which is quite frustrating when jamming. It only wants to close the loop on the closest 4th beat when tempo synced, wish there was an option to tighten this up.
What firmware version are you on?
Anyone got a sustain pedal to work with the bastl midilooper?
Iâm plugging it into the trigger/rec input with an adaptor, but itâs not responding.
I tried the same adapter with the head phones on the metronome input and itâs working.
Any ideas how to fix this?
I use boss fs-5U and it works as expected.
I canât test it right now since it is at a friendâs studio but I remember it hasnât been straightforward at first.
Check polarity to begin with. I remember it refused to work at first and I 'm pretty sure it doesnât work in certain configurations/modes, also depends on what is plugged in maybe ?
The manual says :
âIf none of the voices are set to receive CV on that particular
jack, the jack will act as a pedal input.â
I made it working so Iâm sure you will !
Thanks buddy. Iâll try to get in contact with bastl and hopefully they can sort it out.
Got it to work by turning all the CV func off.
Great looper all the way!
Continuing the discussion from Bastl midi looper:
Hi , to turn all the CVs ON i have to push the voice Button 5 seconds
but how do you turn all the CV off ?
Iâm not near my midi looper but afair you have to turn off the settings(white led) of all 3 knobs to the left, to get the sustain pedal to work as recorder
Answer from Bastl when I was struggling with the settings:
If retrigger, velocity and transpose are light up (white) then it means CV is active fro them, so you should click on each of them in order to disable it.
Thank you very much Ringokidf for your prompt response, unfortunately this is a second hand Midilooper .
All is working well and the white light are off except the voice . I use a DX7 with MIDI out and in, controlling VSTs inside Cubase , I never use a modular synth with CV . I have update the midi looper with the last version ( april 2021) . An update very very easy to do .
Too bad, i like very much this product but l i think i will have to renounce the idea of the use of a pedal to command the record button , i will use my hand .
Does anybody have experience with this and could you illuminate me about why this might be more attractive for multiple synth âsequencingâ than say, a Keystep Pro? (other than slightly cheaper price).
Im looking at either of these as a performance solution and just trying to decide which would feel smoother for my workflow.
Thanks.
Good question. Also canât you essentially record and loop ( and quantize) MIDI with a Digitakt, as well ?
This is a looper, youâre not limited by patterns duration, time signature and suchâŚ
very simple to operate + small form factor
(never tried a Keystep, though)
Yeah the midi looper is way different than a digitakt midi recording
Short version, bastl midi looper can handle way more midi, and will not jump when playing it back
The looper literally just records all the incoming midi and loops it. You essentially have an unlimited amount of CC messages you can send it (though you can, you will start to get interference if you over lap cc numbers and channels) and no steps means no cc jumps. Itâs literally plays back what you did with your hand
The digitakt, you have to set up midi cc lanes via the 8 selectable parameters, you have to manually set those then record midi. So the amount is limited and very manual.
The midi track cc resolution isnât great also. Your smooth filter sweep will still jump parameters per step. You can make it better by changing the step sequencer resolution but you will still ultimately get jumps
Ok, what about the Midiphy Loopa ?
Iâm surprised the Loopa doesnât have its own thread here.
I think Iâm right in saying that the Midiphy Loopa, the Bastl device and the Retrokits RK008 all operate on the principle of recording a real-time stream of midi messages. They all offer different features (number of tracks, quantisation, editing) but the underlying principle is the same and quite different to whatâs usually called sequencing.