I think OT is the best partner for it (and we’ll, usually the best partner for anything).
The things ST lacks, OT has in abundance:
p-lockable compressor
sample playback
deeper FX variety
dedicated MIDI tracks
Arp
more LFOs
song/arranger
parts/kits
The list goes on and on.
And with a combined 20 audio tracks, ST+OT is arguably the most capable Elektron pair.
I received it today and I have to say it is a cool machine - i tested it for a couple of hours but I feel I am much more creative on the AR mk2 and the Cycles for now
The 16 steps and the pads on both plus the plockable machines on the Cycles are a huge advantage if you are into rytm structures and new rytm structures
Five minutes playing with it and it’s ticking the boxes. It kicks hard like the Rytm, but there’s a bit more of a crispness to the sound, less muddy. Both the analogue and digital voices definitely sound better to my ears than they did on their respective forefathers, but that’s maybe just honeymoon ears. The master drive is really nice, opens up the possibility of some pretty heavy drum bus smashing whlie keeping my Analog Heat free for master bus duties.
But you can sound lock different machines on the same track, as long as they’re the same voice type, you just have to use the sound pool instead of the more simple machine locks on the M:C.
since syntakt is part of digi Trinity,the naming was a little confused,if takt = drum,this new one also a synth,why not call it SYNTRACK at first,little brother of OCTATRACK
With that understanding, shouldn’t Syntakt be duodectrack according to you?
Takt is more like “rhythm” in Swedish, or “pace”. So “rytm” but even more Swedishfied + throwing “synth” in there. To me (as a Swedish person), the name makes sense as it is
I wouldn’t see the Syntakt as the little brother of the Octatrack, they are very different from each other.
Well, syn is actually a Swedish word, it means eyesight. But that’s not what Elektron means in this context, they mean the word synt, Swedish for synth.