Look at the encoder behaviour in test mode
Compare each encoder against the others and see if there are irregularities there
In my experience there are rather too many areas where the ‘gearing’ of these ‘encoders’ is way too fast and jittery for the underlying parameter list
User input is on a par with brain surgery. This is ultimately a software fix on the UX front and imho will likely be nothing to do with deteriorations to the hardware per se
As these Sin-Cos potentiometers are analog in nature there’s noise and heat and so on to include in the mix I guess, it’s not monitoring discrete steps
In places it is incredibly difficult to dial in an exact value without the ‘encoder’ skipping through the value you want … unfortunately test mode doesn’t offer simulations of sensitive number inputs, but it is possible to compare encoders
My gut feeling is that users would generally find the same parameters to be fiddly/jumpy/jittery rather than the same encoders on all parameters
The best advise would be to make a note of the difficult parameters to control, see if others are in the same boat and hope for a tweak to an algorithm
Dialling in 14 bit parameters to MSB (coarse) values is often waaaaay too tricky (i.e. 5.0), especially as the LSB(128 Values fine) is represented approximately in a decimal value
Doing this as parameter locks is a whole world of pain as you have no ‘snap’ modifier keys plus you’re also tying up a digit holding a trig
I’m trying not to paint too bleak a picture about this, it may well be a challenge, but similar ‘surgical’ user level input has been required on devices from the OT mk1 onwards in my experience. Some mitigation for this is needed imho, but I think it will take a dedicated bunch to isolate which parameters are too jittery for most people
This in turn may identify if there is a difference or deterioration in performance between ‘encoders’ if some have issues others don’t
My hunch is that this is only needing some software finessing that I hope will happen in time, but as some people clearly don’t mind this too much it may be better to identify all parameters which are objectively too jumpy to dial in efficiently and put this to Elektron to see if there’s scope for improvement. No doubt there are challenges to utilising these particular encoders for all desirable user input, but I hold out hope for a fix for this jittery input issue