I’ve been trying to put together a selection of samples in the +Drive sound pool as a sort of “favorites” starting points with categories mapped to banks. So a bank for kicks, one for snares, etc…
I’ve spent a few hours filling it up and I think the process is overly tedious and inefficient.
As it is, you have to populate the ram sounds, add them to a track, from the track export them to the +drive sound pool.
I only need easy access to samples, I don’t really care at this point about customization.
Here’s some comments:
- It’d be a lot faster if you could load sounds from the sample browser into the +drive sound pool banks without having to add them to a track first.
- retaining the sample file name as the sound name would make things 100 times faster. You have to retype the file name every time, for every sample. Try doing that for a couple of hundreds.
- you should be able to preview the +drive sounds in context with your track, just like you can with the project sound pool. So as you browse through kicks you hear the kicks with the pattern playing…
- with the project samples (ram) it’d be nice to be able to reorder them. So after adding a bunch you could order them by type (kick, snare…).
- tagging and adding favorites on the sample browser also makes sense to me. Why can’t you tag the actual sample files?.
I love the Digitakt but I find it’s lacking in this area. Not being able to save ‘kits” at least you should be able to efficiently handle and organize a library of sounds. I find the workflow convulted and inefficient.
I’d love to hear your comments and any tips to get around this.