Good point! I would expect so - all reviewers mention the filter and amp is “generic”.
I looked at the manual this morning. Looking forward to try one - they really did a good job of removing most options that made the X/Xm complicated, while keeping some that are nice to have (LFO trig, “Analog feel” etc…)
bummer if so. again solidifies the SH-4D as a portable sketchpad, to be paired with an external sequencer and dedicated drum machine whenever possible.
might dust off my TR8S when this arrives in a few weeks. i’m willing to give Roland LCD menu hell another shot if it means a more hands on experience. if all goes well, i’ll have to convert to the House of Roland and shelve my DT and DN for a while.
DT is my axe, but its global mixer is still bugged (so no external fader midi control)
DN voice count and sound design limitations become increasingly hard to justify when things like this hit the market
The rhythm part does not have a mod matrix that I can see in the manual. The manual might not be 100% accurate.
You have the envelope on the sound layers, sound layer mix, per sound filter, per sound envelope, per sound eq, and tone fx on whole part. It’s unclear if the tone fx for the rhythm part can be modulated through automation. You can edit per step velocity and probability.
My theory is that all the retailers have been sent a model for display and for creating YouTube demos etc., but Scan Computers probably have no desire to display a synth in their store so made the single unit available for purchase.
don’t know why everyone is complaining about the design. Might not be a beauty but compared to the aira stuff it’s at least a step in the right direction
I’ve had a little play and it’s generally very nice, but I absolutely HATE the arpeggiator.
It has inherited the same problem from the MC-101/707 where it isn’t quantised to the clock. My timing really isn’t that great so it’s hard to play the arp without it sounding like shite. It’s not quite as bad as the MC-707 as everything you record gets locked to the grid, but I still had to try four or five times to record what I wanted properly without it entering notes into the wrong steps, which brings me to my next point…
Getting your timing right would be a lot easier if there was a count-in/metronome. This is another strange omission. I found myself letting a full four bar loop run through before recording anything. This is a strange omission on a box like this, so I hope they add this in an update.