Thanks that is good to know.
Roland do seem to overcomplicate things for themselves with inconsistencies between products.
How does it sound pattern changing by itself though?
Thanks that is good to know.
Roland do seem to overcomplicate things for themselves with inconsistencies between products.
How does it sound pattern changing by itself though?
It sounds perfect on itās own
My MC-101 behaves the same way when receiving PC messages from my Syntakt. Not sure if itās an Elektron or a Roland problem either, but itās stupid. The workaround is to p-lock PC messages into the patterns themselves on the Syntakt, but that limits your creative freedom considerably.
my brain limits my creative freedom considerably.
Thanks for the streams , just watched them , good stuff
Thanks for the feedback, Iād not done one before so was a bit of a learning curve
Just spent the last two hours pumping some super generic trance with the superwaves oscillators, not even ashamed
Now that I have spent about 10 hours or so with the Sh-4d, I can confidently say that I think it is great. There are definitely some improvements that could be made, the workflow is not on the same level as Elektron, though itās not terrible either. The actual sound and effects are beyond amazing, itās refreshing not having to work so hard just to get good sounds. The portability aspect canāt be understated either, great not having to worry about a power adapter.
I do hope they add a lot more PCM sounds, I want all those cheesey sounds that you hear all over 90ās video games. The current PCM sounds are limited to pretty generic synth sounds which you already can achieve with the other machines.
After seeing more demos on this it is more appealing. I think it sounds great, but Iām still hesitant to deal with Roland stuff anymore after my breakup with the 707 (aside from the little J-6 and T-8). I was infatuated at first, but found it frustrating the further I wanted to push it.
The SH-4D does at least have so much more control up front.
Haha Iām tempted to get one of these just to make cheesy trance.
Really want to hear someone make some Dub Techno with the Sh-4d, with those big lush chords and pads.
This thing looks like it has some potential for me. Has anyone come across any demos that really show itās jammability in a live setting? Hopefully drum mutes arenāt as awkward as they were on the 101.
Iāve got a preorder, but after watching some more demos of how the sequencer works, Iām thinking the sequencing aspects of it are a lot less interesting to me. I donāt do very well with menus and page 1, 2, 3, etcā¦ for creating music. It looks a lot more immediate in most aspects, but much less so in the way sounds are entered and then further modified.
Iām trying to suss out if I should think of it as a simple drum machine with a 4-part multitimbral synth in it thatās best sequenced externally and be ok with that or just cancel the order. I think the sounds themselves will be useful and relevant, even in contexts that arenāt musically vanilla, so to speak. I hear a lot of opportunity for weirdness with the 2 lfos and the very deep selection of effects.
Iāve ordered from Thomann, so I suppose I could take advantage of their 30-day return policy if Iām not into it. Iāve yet to use that part of their services before, so perhaps this is a good time to give it a shot.
Sorry for the out-loud thinking, but I imagine a few other folks might be of the same two minds about the synth. Iād be interested to hear your thinking, if so.
Itās definitely worth it just for the cheesy trance, haha. Here is a demo - I have used 2 supersaws slightly detuned, you could stack another two on as well if you wanted (I probably should have)
Curious what you think: will this thing destroy Korgās Minilogue (XD) and motivate them to come up with something comparable? I see this more of a competition to the affordable analog synths that Korg produces rather than the Elektrons, which still have their sequencer, song mode, MIDI sequencing etc. going for them.
For anyone that doesnāt want to watch the whole live stream from last night, hereās a list of the main cons Iāve found on the SH-4dā¦
Edit: 16) Program Change Messages are only responded to on the Pattern page, if you move from this page during a performance then itāll miss the pattern change.
Other than this itās perfect LOL
Iām thinking itās even more awkward. Same button+pad/trig to mute, but you also canāt see which pads are playing/triggering.
Firmware updates will certainly fix many of the shortcomings. One disappointing design choice however is moving away from the āclipā architecture of the MC101/707. Having the sequence, tone, samples, motion and insert FX of a given part all consolidated in a single clip makes composing and arranging much easier.
It will be interesting to see if Roland releases more instruments based on the SH4d footprint/format.
If youāre on the mixer page you can mute without holding shift
Yes, they need to fix this imo
I wouldnāt count on it. The arpeggiator has had the same wonky behaviour on the MC-707 for over a year and theyāve not fixed it despite everyone complaining about it, and now they just ported it straight over to the SH-4d.
Metronome/count-in was added later to the MC-series though, as were class compliant drivers, so thereās hope there.