Pioneer Toraiz SP-16

Give the DJS-1000 a look. Not recommending it over the SP-16, but just another idea.

I really like the DJS though

1 Like

Oh dear, thatā€™s quite annoying. Thanks for pointing that out. I suppose if itā€™s using the Send FX then that helps, but I think there might only be a single effect and it doubles as the master effect?

I canā€™t really tell the difference (right now) with the DJS-1000 aside from the DJ Deck format and the pitch slider, but no doubt there are some subtle differences Iā€™ll need to explore.

Also according to someone else on the forum, i think check Conforce post, the effects of the SP16 suck

Hello! I got a secondhand SP-16 in spring this year.

On the mixer page you have access to the Send or Master effects so youā€™re right in thinking itā€™s one or the other. Reverb is only available as a send/master and I havenā€™t been able to get a decent sound out of it, though thatā€™s possibly my lack of skill but pretty sure Iā€™ve read elsewhere others have found the same.

There are no stand out digi effects to my ears though I havenā€™t really gone in deep using them. That said, the master compressor (which has a few settings the insert compressor doesnā€™t have) sounds quite tasty to me. Iā€™m not sure they suck (though the reverb as mentioned above might) but theyā€™re unremarkable. I really like the DS drive and filter though. There are some sweet spots to be found!

Iā€™d definitely keep reading around about it as there are some things that might frustrate you and some things that donā€™t work well (using it slaved to something via midi is shaky for example).

Iā€™ve had a lot of fun with mine so far though and in terms of actually finishing tracks itā€™s suited me more than Maschine ever did. The SP-16 arranger is a bit clunky to me but workable and I never got my head around how Maschine did it for some reason.

1 Like

A couple of corrections to the above off the top of my head, unit isnā€™t in front of meā€¦

You can turn off tracks vs. muting to let samples and effects decay naturally.

You can resample individual tracks and the main mixā€¦ you can also bounce and export the mix and import it as a stereo sample.

A way to get around patterns not saving the mute state is just make a bunch of copies of that pattern/scene, deleteing the tracks youā€™re not usingā€¦ or have their volume at zero to ā€œfade inā€.

And also, each scene (which can be seen as a ā€œkitā€) can be assigned to any pattern, and can have the same or different settings per sound/track, so itā€™s not that different from a DT.

The effects (except the reverb and ducker) absolutely rule in the SP-16. I only wish there were more of them.

2 Likes

Hello and thanks for the input.

I had a Maschine Mk3 briefly and although I thought the build quality was great I didnā€™t like the sequencer at all. It really sucked as a step sequencer and it was really awkward to edit anything after the fact.

One thing that appeals to me about the SP-16 is that it seems very simple and straightforward. Lots of voices here seem to support that.

3 Likes

Thanks for confirming

I did not buy the Sp 16 because of the comment on the effects and I sticked with the Rytm

1 Like

Yeah I love the Mk3 as a physical device and it can do some neat things but found sequencing and arranging not good at all.

I had the Rytm before the SPā€¦ apples and oranges but I generally just prefer Pioneerā€™s UI and workflow for dedicated sampling. But IMO it needs at least one Elektron machine to compliment it, especially in the sequencer department.

1 Like

Id say it is very easy to resample internally. You can record live to one of the 16 pads/tracks or bounce to the internal memory. Or maybe Im not understanding that question.

It is very easy and fun to use.

I think the insert FX are mostly useable. Though they may not be anything special.

I find arrangement mode quick and intuitive and then you can simply bounce the whole arrangementā€¦either master or all 16 tracks separately to either internal memory or a usb stick. There are a lot of rendering options actually.

I mostly bought it bc it uses Pioneerā€™s DJ Link and connects w my CDJs but have found I love it for sketching out tracks to finish in my DAW. Probably selling my DT because the SP 16 is all I need. If it is confirmed it is discontinued Im buying another one just in case.

It is probably worth checking out the DJS 1000 though. I agonized over the two for years but never was willing to drop the coin. After I noticed the price drop it was a no brainer for me.

Where did you see a price reduction?

In UK it is still Ā£849

They used to cost twice as much. Like $1500 USD The price reduction is a bit dated. By some years I believe.

I probably just havenā€™t realised the price drop because I wasnā€™t looking, but in some places now (and when I last seriously looked) It was way up over a grand.

Irrespective of timing, Ā£849 seems like decent value compared to similar groovebox units.

Itā€™s a steal tbh

Itā€™s no Octatrack or MPC, but itā€™s the one piece of gear Iā€™ll never sell. Donā€™t know why. I just like it.

6 Likes

The one thing the SP16 does hands down better than other boxes is live sampling. The fact you can adjust your loop after itā€™s recorded, but prior to it being permanently saved is a awesome.

Can you elaborate on what this entails? This is news to me :smiley:

As to FX quality, my favorite is the lofi as you have the sample and bit reduction along with filters that are, IMHO, as good as whatā€™s in the filter effect itself. The reverb can be usable with some short decay times and careful tuning. Its good enough to bring sounds into the same ā€œroomā€ but itā€™s nothing that youā€™d want to feature as a shimmer or anything.

1 Like

Itā€™s worth keeping an eye on eBay and Reverb as they pop up at around Ā£600 - Ā£650.

1 Like

Howā€™s the midi sync, have they resolved the sync issues most people were having?

You CAN group the channels by output (mixer > output settings > choose output per channel) and use it for sends / bus mixes that way. The device has a bunch of physical outputs which is great.

I love that it has lots of analog outputs AND all the file rendering capabilities. I understand the limitations some people donā€™t like about the SP-16 but on the other hand it offers interesting combinations. MPC style pads + step sequencer being another.

1 Like