I guess it’s safe to assume that a company with the resources and determination Behringer has, will have had several of these sorts of projects pipelined for a year or more already.
Or alternatively they could acquire or license these technologies from other developers with technology near completion. Think of some of the companies and individuals with plugin code who might take the buyout, and help move that software onto hardware.
I’m not saying anything here that isn’t obvious really. Only to expect large growth in the short term in digital synthesis from Behringer. And hopefully that includes some competitive and inspired new creation.
Again, not their operation. For example, they used Émilie Gillet’s code that was open sourced so they wouldn’t have to develop a digital synth themselves.
I’m starting to feel like Behringer is closing an era and isn’t aware their part of it. After most hardware got emulated in software more people grabbing back to hardware . If they continue like this and every machine that meant something and influenced electronic music from it’s early birth is available to the masses in a affordable and .
mint condition …
the circle is closed
There’s only one chapter after Behringer’s
clonewars. Renewal, innovation and instruments we can’t imagine yet. I think i like it.
I really agree with this. Elsewhere i called it encroachment, by which i mean out of bounds in a business and ethical sense, but probably in a general sense legal.
That the Pro-16 has the differences it does, i mean the multi-timbrality, really helps distinguish these two though. That’s something anyone can easily hear.
To be complete on this though, it’s now Focusrite Sequential. Whether or not this consolidation came from Behringer’s entry and expectation of products like the Pro-16, one can speculate.
[By “in a general sense”, i mean, without some specific patent violation or such like.]
I don’t understand, Dave Smith runs Sequential and is going to be influencing Focusrite [to inspire in Chris Huggett’s absence], not the other way around.
Focusrite would have larger power when it comes to suing a company I guess.
But I just hope they use their energy to come up with the future-oriented synth B seems not willing to create.
100 pultec clones…no one cares
100 moog filter clones…no one care
BuT nOt My HeCkIn 3o3-aRiNoS!
(Full disclosure i dont own any behringer stuff other than patchbays, but not because he clones sequential, its because i dont desire a sequential cloned or original)
(2nd full disclosure…id kinda like to see Martin Shkreli on MusicTribe’s board of directors)
I don’t thinking the cloning is as much the issue as their business practices and ethics.
It’s the attempts to subvert the very companies and people whose ‘legacies’ they invoke. Many of whom are still active.
Alongside that, you have attempts to confuse uninformed consumers by acquiring trademarks, logos and iconography to provide an air of legitimacy.
These are things that don’t sit too well with me. And possibly others from what I’ve read.
Add to that the pisspoor design choices and overall cheapness and it just makes everything off putting.
I should add that considering how community driven the world of synths had been for so long prior to the last decade, it’s hardly surprising that behringer would get the response they do. They already had a poor reputation before they began producing synths.
Perfek, only tweaks that could improve would be making it a beaker or lab flask or duplicating cylinders in the same icon
Seriously, they have little interest in trying to go on their own merits. People liked the Deepmind, why couldn’t they keep on with those takes?* They’d build their own legacy.
*Because they don’t want to invest R&D, their engineers are capable of doing so, they choose not to allot enough to development.
I can see you point with the “ethics”, but I do believe there bias due to our job/hobby/whatever. There are far worse companies out there, but still continue to use everyday. Amazon reduces humans to an algorithm to see if you viable. Imagine being fired by an app. Google know itself all to well that it changed its company motto of “Do no evil”
Im very free enterprise, so none of this surprises me. I think amazon’s employment practices are far worse then Behringers business choices, but until someone offers me a better solution, have to deal with the available options. An original 808 isn’t an option for most.
Not sure how it is elsewhere, but in the US, you can’t copywrite/tradepark/patent a circuit. You can copywriter the printed schematics, the PCB layout, the architecture to make the circuit, but not the circuit itself. SO this is why I don’t see an issue with making OB-X’s, swings, sm58’s, and whatever else is out there. Surprised there isn’t a xone96 clone yet.
