this really good @rephazer !!! muito legal!
How hard is to play keys on the machine? this one not velocity sensitive am I correct?
Thanks! The pads on the 101 are not velocity sensitive and playing them is okay I guess. I am more of a sequencing guy 
1 Like
Great stuff! Nice to see you on the 101 
1 Like
Thank you
your comments and demos won me over
2 Likes
Hadnāt used the 707 since the latest update. The copy and pasting of drum instruments was very much missed from the previous versions. Now if Roland would just implement sysex controlā¦
Im really only missing an arp on the 707. Itās a great box, but feeding arp into clips via midi is a bit meh.
And a count-in
3 Likes
Iāve never been an arp guy. Although the one on the xp60 I have is kinda killer.
Count in hopefully included in the next update.
Continuing the 101 journey 
10 Likes
Dope
1 Like
thanks 
really good. super to see the synths and loop track working beautifully together like this.
god i wish theyād open up the tones for editing just a bit more.
1 Like
The MC-707 keeps popping up used locally for around $720. I have been tempted a few times, but am still unsure. After some of the recent updates it seems to be much more mature, but the sample time limits still seems low.
Are people that purchased initially happy with the updates, or does it feel like a few things are still missing?
Is it better as a central hub, a midi module, or all by itself?
I only have the 101; bought as a rompler with a sequencer. It hasnāt disappointed on the rompler front. Sequencer is handy but I prefer to plug in other sequencers.
Though the patches are limited in the synth edit, the effects are good for what I need.
You can create a polyphonic 4 track chain of clips and resample and apply a wide range of onboard effects and scatter to make a lot of interesting variation.
It is a bit fiddly though and takes time to know the menus.
707 looks much more accessible and powerful, but I wanted a smaller box as I have elektron to do the heavy liftingā¦
1 Like
I thought it would bug me more, but Iām pretty ok with the editing. Since there are so many sounds I always find something that gets me in the ballpark + the fx can add a lot.
I used not to use presets much, but on this device I kind of like it. It lets me concentrate more on making tunes.
I wish there were less cheesy sounds. But the basses are great, pads and epiano sounds as well. It usually doesnāt take me long to find something that fits the track and the sound engine itself is really good for my taste
Great tune!
1 Like
thanks, mate 
Just got a used 707 for 700 a week ago. Been messing with it, and while the menu structure is a bit less intuitive than a Digitaktās, Iām finding myself enjoying a lot of what it can do.
Iām seeing a lot of people discussing the preset tones, but I havenāt even touched them. Been focusing on using my own grab bag of self-made and downloaded on shots for the drum kits, and I do appreciate being able to process them on potentially four effects routes (MFX, then the master reverb, delay, and MFX).
Whatās really been interesting is the synth engine. Iād made a few dozen synth samples for the V-Synth and the Blofeld SL, and Iāve stuck these into the MC-707ās synth. Unlike the others which can play 2x samples, the 707 can potentially handle 4 at a time. The sounds I get are pretty different thanks to the per-partial sound editing. It also helps maybe layer a few samples with some VA or PCM sound. And then, the resamplingā¦
Finally, the looper. Still trying to wrap my head around it, particularly the subdivisions and the timestretching. It sometimes doesnāt sound too good, but it can add a layer of filth to a drum line.
1 Like
Were you able to register your used 707? I ended up picking up a used one. It should arrive this evening. Excited to give it a go.
Next one.
tell me if I should stop posting tracks here 
, Iāll use the āshare your tunesā thread then.
But I thought people might be more interested in 101 demos here.
8 Likes