Seperate outs… drunk jammin’ friendly interface too.
1 Like
- stereo samples, ACB modelled drums, 3 extra parts, more fx.
Different beasts I think, both have benefits over the other.
FX per track?
Dammit you guys, I’m trying to avoid GAS, not intensify it. 
1 Like
The old one Model had that already too and fx could be motion recorded.
Ok , hopefully my last post on this thread .
I’m just a bloke morning on a forum making unfinished bleeps on an iPad , I’m quite aware it takes talent to be successful which is hopefully why the relevant artists were chosen .this isn’t a dig at any artist .
Nothing I’ve written questions the ability of the musicians involved , if I ever got the chance to release my music/play live I’d hope / expect it to be on quality of music.
I know within the text above it could be taken in positive / negative way , taken out if context or ignored.
You may be pleased to know I’ve just picked up my tablets so i may be more rational soon.
This comment is a statement of fact , not a side swipe to mental health , please let’s get back on topic which I wrongly diverted from.
I won’t post in this thread anymore .i didn’t intend to offend anyone .
5 Likes
ACB (analogue circuit behaviour). A velocity sensitive pad.
I only get gas when I hear 2 magic words serialized.
Separate.
Outputs.
7 Likes
Eight. Eight!
3 Likes
its a drum machine that can import 24bit 96khz wave files 
name me one other other drum machine that can do that.
TR-8s has 11 tracks, DT only 8.
Well, technically DT has 16 tracks. It can only produce sound for 8 of them. Which brings up an interesting question; can you sequence external gear with the TR-8S?
1 Like
24bit 96khz wave file import function to start with.
Well, that’s something I don’t really care about. Don’t have any samples with that resolutions anyway.
3 Likes
oh, i care a lot about that function and the Digitakt doesn’t have it.
I would have been fine if Roland had released a TR-8 Mk II instead with no sample playback at all.
Its ancestor the TR-808 was popular for certain sounds, but it was also popular because of the workflow. A drum machine you can just on and make beats quickly without diddling around w/ samples (a near endless pursuit of the perfect snare sample, the perfect cymbal, etc - loading, auditioning, and rejecting samples over and over) does have a certain appeal…
guess what… you can still do this !
1 Like
Yeah, just making the point that I would have been fine if all the upgrades were there, minus the sample playback.
Separate outs is not important for you either ? variations ? Even without the samples, this thing is a nice upgrade to the previous model, don’t you think ?