Dieter says delete.
1 Like
This is one of the things that drove me a little nuts with the super 6. So many quirks that I didnāt know were bugs, or were hardware malfunctions, or were how it was supposed to work. You will probably find a lot of these if you are using the 6 a lot.
Another thing that I noticed is that the colors of the sliders are different on a lot of units. Mine were all white, but I see a lot of people have some black sliders too, but always a different number and in different places lol.
Last patch here āJardinā is amazing 
Finally did a sound pack for the Super 6. All about big atmospheric, cinematic pads, drones and unconventional sounds.
2 Likes
Iāve had the Super 6 Desktop for about two and a half weeks now, and Iām honestly torn between thinking that this is the best thing since sliced bread and being quite irritated at missing features, strange bugs, and flat out erroneous documentation.
The pros:
- Mein Gott i himmelen, it sounds beautiful, especially for large pads. The binaural aspect is so much more than a gimmick, and even just loading up and playing a single saw wave on one of the oscillators with some slight modulation can be enough. For the sounds it can create, itās probably, hand down, the most beautiful poly synth Iāve ever heard.
- Itās so immediate. I own the Analog Four and Iāve also had the Novation Peak for a while, and while both of those instruments are super capable, I was/I am never just inspired to dive into the mod matrix (i.e., dive into submenus on a screen) on these synths, but for the Super 6, I do it all the time. Not having a screen was definitely the right move.
- It looks beautiful. Many people might not really care about this, but I simply wonāt get inspired by an instrument that looks cheap and boring. The Super 6 Desktop on the other hand, I could hang up on the wall just to look at. I almost hope they wonāt release a blue version, because I might be tempted to actually get it.
The cons:
- There are strange bugs (which often can be solved by power cycling the synth), or just unexplainable omissions such that you cannot modify the VCA volume as a source in the mod matrix.
- Patches are quite slow to load. This means that itās hard to improvise with the instrument and reset it to its original state without having some hiccups in the sound.
- While MPE has been implemented, itās unfortunately not fully implemented. Polyphonic aftertouch works as expected, but pitch bend is only hardwired to, well, pitch, and if you have an extra dimension on your MPE controller, the best you can do is to only control the filter cutoff with it. As such, I cannot utilise my Expressive E Osmose to the fullest with the Super 6, which is kind of frustrating because I know how nice it would be.
- While the developers are quite open about what theyāre woking on (in comparison to Elektron, itās like a fully transparent process), it still feels like they have a long way to go when it comes to proper communication with their customers. It sometimes feels like the synth is in a permanent beta and many features that are documented in the manual (or some that arenāt) simply donāt work as expected. Unfortunately, it shows that UDO Audio is a new company, and itās frustrating because so much could be solved by a bit clearer communication that would create trust in people like me, whoās still not confident that all of these issues will be handled.
So, Iām kinda torned. I can still return the device if I want to, and I might actually do so with the intention to buy it again in a year or two when and if all the quirks have been ironed out and the synth actually behaves the way it says it should behave in the manual.
Even so, Iām enjoying it for now. Hereās a number of improvised snippets on custom patches that Iāve made:
5 Likes
Thanks for your review. How do you find the faders on the desktop version? I sold my keyboard version for about the same reasons you mentioned, but was also thinking about buying it again sometime in the future because I do miss the sound. But if I did I would go for the desktop version due to space and how I work now. But I am wondering if the faders short throw (or other issues) on the desktop version would be a problem.
I havenāt tried the keyboard version, so I canāt compare it to that. But in my own view, the buttons, faders, and knobs are all excellent. Zero complaints really (except that one single of the faders is less stiff than the others, but I can live with that). Also, I havenāt reflected about the length of the sliders, so itās not a problem for me anyway. And theyāre very sensitive, so even a small nudge will make a difference.
1 Like
Desktop owner here, I do wish the faders had more travel but I donāt mind them. Also both versions are on sale at various outlets so itās as good a time as any to pick one up if anyone is considering it.
3 Likes
Donāt focus too much on what you canāt do with the Super 6 in terms of MPE. If it allows you to reach into polyAT territory thatās fair enough. Beyond that, the Super 6 is able to do stuff which your Osmose canāt and vice versa. For example, the key bed of the Osmose makes it rather difficult to use it as a poly synth, at least when it comes to obtain that typical tone thereof. I usually find songwriting value in synths that sound complementary.
3 Likes
This. If it just doesnāt work for what you want thatās different, but you seem to like the sound and interface. I had a friend over the other day who tried it out with my Linnstrument. I assigned a bit of AT to filter and x-mod on my init MPE patch and he was blown away; got right to tweaking and had a good time. I went in with my eyes open and have had good tech support from them when Iāve needed it. It also plays well with pedals.
I would like more modulation range on parameters (it seems a bit āsafeā), a simple mono setting, and bug fixes as well. But none of that is stopping me from playing it.
3 Likes
Well, one of the reasons why I bought the Super 6 was to take full advantage of it together with my Osmose, as I really like the expressiveness of it but donāt really like the way Iām constrained to just editing a few parameters for the internal sounds. Reading the manual, it seems like this should be possible to do as well.
That is, thereās a lot of poly synths I stayed clear of just because they didnāt have full MPE support. So even though Iām really impressed by and really like the sounds of my Super 6, if Iām going to keep it, I still need (want) to buy another synth in order to take full advantage of my Osmose, and I donāt really see my buying and owning two beasts in this price class.
Again, if the communication by UDO Audio would be better, Iād probably feel confident enough that full MPE support eventually would arrive, which would make me keep the synth. Keeping it now feels like playing the lottery though. It might still be worth it, but itās still a feeling of unease.
The Osmoseās EaganMatrix is fully programmable when connected to the Haken Editor. If you find it too complex for your needs, be sure to check out the Continuumās presets, which you can import into the Osmoseās user area and which generally sound pretty good on the latter despite several design differences between both instruments.
The Hydrasynth is one of the few poly synths with a great MPE implementation and a great synth UI, in a very affordable price range.
In the software realm, Equator 2 is pretty good for MPE.
1 Like
Is there an alternative with a full and proper MPE Y axis implementation? In hardware, I only know of the Micromonsta (which I have and love) and the Hydrasynth.
1 Like
I donāt get the whole āpermanent betaā narrative. Isnāt that just another way of saying āstill receiving active firmware updatesā? Seems like a good thing to me.
4 Likes
Synthstrom Deluge. You can assign all 3 dimensions to most of the parameters (unlimited mod matrix). Itās not supporting release velocity though. But you can configure MPE channel splits and also record MPE to sequencer.
Another are all Haken Audio Continuum models.
1 Like
Right! The Haken Audio ones are fantastic sounding. I have the mini and it ājust worksā with my Linnstrument. But I find editing the Eaganmatrix to be a real bear and not something one can do in real time (like moving faders on the Super 6). So to me it feels more like a bunch of awesome MPE presets. Didnāt know about the Deluge though!
Consider the Continuum and the Osmose to be more like a piano, which comes with a single unmodifiable preset. Now how to make music with just one preset?
1 Like
It is true that our piano comes with one giant, awesome, preset.
1 Like
I agree with the āpermanent betaā sentiment to some degree. Problem is, thereās a lot of bugs showing up (I often have to restart my synth a couple of times per session because it becomes unresponsive), features that are documented in the manual that donāt work (for example, the way MPE is described), and some features that arenāt documented at all (for example having the LFO2 constantly on when turning off the MW AT button).
Fixing these isnāt, in my view, the same thing as introducing new features; itās fixing a broken instrument.
Yeah, thatās true. But I want a hardware instrument with direct control over the parameters, without having to go via a computer. If youāre okay with using a computer, there are tons of good, fully customizable MPE synths.
2 Likes